Sunday, October 6, 2013

On Rank

Last week's Chapter 5 and this week's chapter 6 are both "team" focused chapters.

There is much in these chapters that resonates with me and applies to my workplace, the ELA.

The ELA is a fairly big team, with a great deal of diversity. We have native and non-native speakers of English. We have Japanese instructors, and non-Japanese. We have among the non-Japanese a wide range of nationalities: British, Australian, Scottish, Finnish, and many Americans. We are divided by contract status: some instructors are on short-term contracts, others longer, and some on permanent contracts. We are also differentiated by gender.

While, for the most part, we do a wonderful job of working together to create a great program for all of you, the differences between us,  especially "rank" differences, cause a lot of subtle problems. I say subtle because in general, we are very equality focused. We all teach the same courses, teach the same amount as one another, share in all the non-teaching responsibilities that come with a program like this, and we each have a vote in decision making. It would seem that we are equal.

In reality, however, there are differences. Someone with a permanent contract can, in many ways, do as they like. They can speak up at meetings, choose to be against the directors, not show up at a retreat, etc. Someone for whom English is their native language has an advantage over a non-native speaker when debating issues. Someone from a more debate-oriented culture (e.g. British) has an advantage over someone from a harmony-focused culture (e.g. Japanese). Males, in general, have advantages over females. Those who go home to a family have advantages over those who go home to an apartment alone. People who drink alcohol have advantages over those who do not. Etc.

In psychology these differences are known as "rank." And what you need to know about rank is that those in a lower rank are much more aware of and sensitive to rank differences than those in a higher rank. So... the take-away point that I want you to remember is to be very sensitive and considerate of rank differences, especially those of lower rank than you. You will naturally be somewhat blind to these differences, but those below you will not be.

I work with several people in the ELA of similar rank to me, that have little or no sensitivity to the advantage that they have over others, and this causes a lot of unnecessary resentment. Don't let this be you.

2 comments:

  1. Ken,

    "And what you need to know about rank is that those in a lower rank are much more aware of and sensitive to rank differences than those in a higher rank." I think this is a great reminder as these situations can be seen all the time. Also bringing up the situation in the ELA gives a lot of reality to the story and it is interesting to see how the principles we are learning are being applied to in real life.

    Take

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Ken,

    Your blog was really interesting to read:) I cannot imagine how difficult it must be to come to a decision in a discussion with teachers with such distinct backgrounds. I was wondering if you or the director do anything special to let "the lower ranking people" feel that they're not disadvantaged. For example, allowing more chances for non-native English speakers to speak during meetings etc.

    Yuca

    ReplyDelete